Italy Revamps Golden Power Rules, Aligns with EU on Finance
- New Regulations for Golden Power
- Minister Giorgetti's Defense
- Unicredit-Bpm Case
- Italy's Response to EU Infringement Procedure
- Similar Actions in Spain
- Key Aspects of Italy's Golden Power Reform
- Comparison of Intervention Procedures
- Impact on Financial Institutions
- EU's Role in National Security Matters
- Strategic Sectors Under Golden Power
- Timeline of Key Events
Rome is changing the rules of the Golden Power, a tool designed to protect strategic Italian assets. A significant change is being introduced: for operations involving banks, insurance companies, and the financial sector, the State will not be able to intervene before the relevant European authorities have spoken.
New Regulations for Golden Power
With an amendment to the Transition 5.0 decree, the government stipulates that the State's special powers will only come into play after the European Central Bank has assessed the prudential profiles and the European Commission has assessed the competitive ones. Until then, national procedures remain suspended. This move sends a clear political signal: the Golden Power remains active, but its exercise will be more coordinated with Brussels, thus reducing potential friction on the extensive use of the instrument in large market operations.
Scope of the Golden Power
The new regulatory framework also clarifies the scope of the Golden Power, which does not shrink: it remains valid for non-EU entities and for operations within the Union, including those between Italian operators, when the acquisition involves stable control of strategic companies. Among the official criteria, national economic and financial security is now also included, alongside public order and safety, but only in cases where there is no sufficient European discipline.
Minister Giorgetti's Defense
The Minister of Economy, Giancarlo Giorgetti, has strenuously defended this principle in talks with Brussels, stressing that economic and financial security is fully within the scope of national security.
Unicredit-Bpm Case
Symbolic of the tensions between national powers and European rules was the intervention on the Unicredit-Bpm dossier: the Italian executive imposed stringent conditions that effectively forced the bank to withdraw the offer, despite the preliminary approval of the EU Commission.
Italy's Response to EU Infringement Procedure
Rome has already shown openness to changes to find a way out of the EU infringement procedure, while reiterating the State's right to protect national interests. It is unclear whether Italy will accept any requests from Brussels to annul the conditions or whether it will challenge the decision in court: an unfavorable ruling could expose the State to claims for damages worth billions of euros.
Similar Actions in Spain
The Italian case is not isolated. In Spain, the government also intervened in the Bbva-Sabadell merger, imposing political constraints and time limitations that effectively slow down the operation. Here too, Brussels had to intervene, opening an infringement procedure for alleged violation of the ECB's competences and EU rules on bank mergers.
These episodes show how, throughout Europe, governments like to remember their presence in major strategic affairs. Italy is now trying to do so with greater discretion, coordinating with Brussels, without completely renouncing its role as guardian of its most sensitive assets.
Key Aspects of Italy's Golden Power Reform
Here's a breakdown of the key changes to Italy's Golden Power regulations:
| Aspect | Description |
|---|---|
| Scope | Applies to banks, insurance, and finance sectors. |
| Intervention | State intervention occurs after EU authorities' assessment. |
| Coordination | Enhanced coordination with Brussels. |
| Security | Includes national economic and financial security. |
Comparison of Intervention Procedures
A comparison of intervention procedures in Italy and Spain:
| Country | Intervention | EU Response |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | Conditions imposed on Unicredit-Bpm merger. | EU infringement procedure initiated. |
| Spain | Constraints on Bbva-Sabadell merger. | EU infringement procedure initiated. |
Impact on Financial Institutions
The table below outlines the potential impacts on financial institutions:
| Impact Area | Description |
|---|---|
| Mergers & Acquisitions | Increased scrutiny and potential delays. |
| Capital Flows | Monitoring of transactions involving strategic assets. |
| Compliance | Need for alignment with both national and EU regulations. |
EU's Role in National Security Matters
The following table illustrates the EU's role in national security matters:
| Area | EU Competence |
|---|---|
| Financial Regulation | Supervisory role through ECB and Commission. |
| Merger Control | Assessment of competitive impacts. |
| Infringement Procedures | Action against member states for violations of EU law. |
Strategic Sectors Under Golden Power
List of strategic sectors typically under Golden Power regulations:
| Sector | Description |
|---|---|
| Banking | Financial institutions crucial for economic stability. |
| Insurance | Key players in financial risk management. |
| Energy | Essential for national infrastructure and security. |
| Telecommunications | Critical for communication and data infrastructure. |
Timeline of Key Events
Here's a timeline of key events related to the Golden Power and EU interventions:
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| [Current Date] | Italy modifies Golden Power rules. |
| [Date of Unicredit-Bpm] | Intervention on Unicredit-Bpm dossier. |
| [Date of Bbva-Sabadell] | Government intervention in Bbva-Sabadell merger. |
What's Your Reaction?
-
0
Like -
0
Dislike -
0
Funny -
0
Angry -
0
Sad -
0
Wow